Conversation with my supplier.
I would like to share what i did today and relate it with what i learned in Critical thinking class. today i had a conversation with my potential supplier .
Me : What is the Minimum order quantity for the Carbon handle bar
Supplier : We can sell you at wholesale price for atleast 10 handle bars.
Me : Do you have warranty for these handle bars?
Supplier : No need for warranty , these handle bars are very high quality they are made from high quality and hande made finishing.
Me : How about your term of payment ?
supplier : We do accept western union and moneygram.
Me : Can i transfer the payment via TT.
supplier : Why want to use TT , Western union is much more better and faster.
Me : how long does it takes to arrive in malaysia.
Supplier : 3 weeks.
Me : Why does it takes so long , what kind of shipping company do you use ?
supplier : I use registered post .
Me : Why you want to charge so much if you only use registered post instead of express service.
Supplier : This is why i charge you so cheap on the shipping cost because the registered post is much more cheaper.
Me : Thanks , i 'll call you next time then.
Supplier : No need for warranty , these handle bars are very high quality they are made from high quality and hande made finishing.
If you take a look carefully on this conservation , the supplier try to use Red herring Fallacy to distract me from the main topic. I asked him about the warranty but he was bubling about something else to make me forget about the warranty issue.
supplier : Why want to use TT , Western union is much more better and faster.
This is another example the supplier tried to use red herring fallacy by giving a mislead premises to distract me from the main issue.
Supplier : This is why i charge you so cheap on the shipping cost because the registered post is much more cheaper.
The supplier is using petitio principii on me . He was repeating the same words in the same order in both premiss and conclusion.
Me : What is the Minimum order quantity for the Carbon handle bar
Supplier : We can sell you at wholesale price for atleast 10 handle bars.
Me : Do you have warranty for these handle bars?
Supplier : No need for warranty , these handle bars are very high quality they are made from high quality and hande made finishing.
Me : How about your term of payment ?
supplier : We do accept western union and moneygram.
Me : Can i transfer the payment via TT.
supplier : Why want to use TT , Western union is much more better and faster.
Me : how long does it takes to arrive in malaysia.
Supplier : 3 weeks.
Me : Why does it takes so long , what kind of shipping company do you use ?
supplier : I use registered post .
Me : Why you want to charge so much if you only use registered post instead of express service.
Supplier : This is why i charge you so cheap on the shipping cost because the registered post is much more cheaper.
Me : Thanks , i 'll call you next time then.
Supplier : No need for warranty , these handle bars are very high quality they are made from high quality and hande made finishing.
If you take a look carefully on this conservation , the supplier try to use Red herring Fallacy to distract me from the main topic. I asked him about the warranty but he was bubling about something else to make me forget about the warranty issue.
supplier : Why want to use TT , Western union is much more better and faster.
This is another example the supplier tried to use red herring fallacy by giving a mislead premises to distract me from the main issue.
Supplier : This is why i charge you so cheap on the shipping cost because the registered post is much more cheaper.
The supplier is using petitio principii on me . He was repeating the same words in the same order in both premiss and conclusion.
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 7:22 AM.
You can skip to the end and leave a response.
» Post a Comment